Tyco Collector's Forum -
Welcome to the forum.
Username:
Password:
Save Password


Register
Forgot your Password?
  Home   Forums   Events Calendar   Forum Admins & Mods   FAQ   Install Search Provider   Register
Active Topics | Active Polls | Newsletters | Member Map | Members | Online Users |
[ Active Members: 0 | Anonymous Members: 0 | Guests: 15 ]  [ Total: 15 ]  [ Newest Member: EmberRush ] Select Skin:
 All Forums
 The Builders Depot
 Layouts - Construction and Operations
 Does realism take away from operation enjoyment?
   All users can post NEW topics in this forum
   All users can reply to topics in this forum
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic: Layout Lighting Topic Next Topic: Bank scene  

TycoTodd
Switcher

Status: offline

 Posted - March 20 2009 :  2:42:30 PM Link directly to this topic  Show Profile  Add TycoTodd to Buddylist
I'm building a HO scale layout after being out of the hobby for 25 years. Being older (and I thought wiser) I decided to spring for DCC, "good" locos (Proto), kadee couplers etc. Back in the 70's most of my railroad consisted of Tyco motive power and freight cars, all with truck mounted horn hook couplers. Yes, I had the Layout expander system with the two sidings and spent hours switching freight cars using those uncoupler tracks. Well, I just mocked up my layout and had one big discovery- you can't couple kadees on 18 or 22" curves! Since my sidings have many curves, I'm in trouble.
Here's my layout design (don't laugh, it's 7x4):


Sure, with the horn hooks you could only uncouple on the special track and couldn't move the cars to another location "uncoupled" but at least with the coupler mounted horn hooks I could couple anywhere.
Is anyone still running horn hooks? I don't think I'll go back to them but this does mean I'll have to rethink my sidings. Perhaps a small "yard" using straight track instead...

Todd


Edited by - TycoTodd on March 20 2009 2:43:10 PM
 Country: Canada  ~  Posts: 55  ~  Member Since: February 28 2009  ~  Last Visit: November 21 2009 Alert Moderator 

catfordken
Moderator




SREnglishGentlemanAvatar

Status: offline

 Posted - March 20 2009 :  2:51:38 PM Link directly to this reply  Show Profile  Send catfordken a Yahoo! Message  Add catfordken to Buddylist
hi i thought kadees were magnetic,if so surely a magnet anywhere will uncouple ken
 Country: United Kingdom  ~  Posts: 8294  ~  Member Since: September 28 2006  ~  Last Visit: October 20 2021 Alert Moderator  Go To Top Of Page

TycoTodd
Switcher

Status: offline

 Posted - March 20 2009 :  3:00:42 PM Link directly to this reply  Show Profile  Add TycoTodd to Buddylist
Uncoupling isn't the issue, it's coupling them on curves.


Edited by - TycoTodd on March 20 2009 3:00:59 PM
 Country: Canada  ~  Posts: 55  ~  Member Since: February 28 2009  ~  Last Visit: November 21 2009 Alert Moderator  Go To Top Of Page

GoingInCirclez
Big Boy


Status: offline

 Posted - March 20 2009 :  3:03:49 PM Link directly to this reply  Show Profile  Add GoingInCirclez to Buddylist
Could it be that now, your new equipment uses exclusively body-mount, as opposed to talgo or truck-mount couplers?

In the 70's most equipment used the truck-mount couplers, which would naturally stay in-line on a curve. With body-mount couplers there will always be an offset of some degree. Of course horn-hooks might have more reach even so... but the lesser reach of a knuckle would be more compounded on a body-mount.

I pretty much run knuckles exclusively now EXCEPT for the vintage / Tyco type stuff. I have a few conversion cars I use so I can mix them in trains from time to time. But since the original kadee patent expired, almost all new rolling has come with knuckles, so horn-hooks could very be considered obsolete. There's billions of em out there though...!
 Country: USA  ~  Posts: 2175  ~  Member Since: July 15 2006  ~  Last Visit: January 31 2010 Alert Moderator  Go To Top Of Page

MM 1498
Big Boy


ICRAvatar

Status: offline

 Posted - March 20 2009 :  5:21:24 PM Link directly to this reply  Show Profile  Click to see MM 1498's MSN Messenger address  Add MM 1498 to Buddylist
I run horn-hooks because they are cheaper, stay together (unlike the majority of my knuckle-equipped stuff ), and if you have a small screwdriver they can still be easily uncoupled.

Problem is, most of them are mounted on the trucks, so derailments can be an issue.


- Matt -
 Country: Canada  ~  Posts: 1021  ~  Member Since: August 24 2008  ~  Last Visit: January 05 2020 Alert Moderator  Go To Top Of Page

DaCheez
Big Boy



Nose

Status: offline

 Posted - March 21 2009 :  5:39:57 PM Link directly to this reply  Show Profile  Click to see DaCheez's MSN Messenger address  Add DaCheez to Buddylist
I agree with GiC. On my layout, I find it's more a problem of how the couplers are mounted, rather than the couplers themselves. I prefer using truck-mounted couplers as they follow the track, and *usually* stay in-line with each other. Body-mounted couplers, regardless of whether they are knuckle or horn-hook, are always more akward. I've had one or two close calls where I've had to catch 85ft streamliners in mid-air 4 ft off the ground

quote:
Is anyone still running horn hooks? I don't think I'll go back to them but this does mean I'll have to rethink my sidings.


I often convert knuckles back to hornhooks. The guy at my LHS has told me a few times that I'm going backwards.

-cheez
 Country: Canada  ~  Posts: 3430  ~  Member Since: September 22 2006  ~  Last Visit: November 09 2025 Alert Moderator  Go To Top Of Page

MM 1498
Big Boy


ICRAvatar

Status: offline

 Posted - March 21 2009 :  6:18:06 PM Link directly to this reply  Show Profile  Click to see MM 1498's MSN Messenger address  Add MM 1498 to Buddylist
quote:
I often convert knuckles back to hornhooks.
Originally posted by DaCheez-March 21 2009: 5:39:57 PM



I hear ya on that one!


- Matt -
 Country: Canada  ~  Posts: 1021  ~  Member Since: August 24 2008  ~  Last Visit: January 05 2020 Alert Moderator  Go To Top Of Page
  Previous Topic: Layout Lighting Topic Next Topic: Bank scene  
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
 Image Forums 2001 This page was generated in 2.69 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000